Last spring a minister of this government to blame for an apartment overlooking the Colosseum was found to be licked based on a scandal of corruption, procurement and recycling, and soon was forced to resign because his historic words, it could not "suspect lived in a house paid for in part by others" (to be precise with cashier's checks from the account of the crack dell'affarista Diego Anemone ). That minister was not the first time he was forced to resign from the leadership of one of the most important ministries of a Berlusconi government between 2001 and 2002 in a few months before he managed not ashamed of Italy with his wisdom and savoir-faire, the Security infamous G8 summit in Genoa, then finished at the center of controversy for removed the basis for a labor law soon after killed by the Red Brigade, described the murder pain in the ass and then resigned. To complete the picture a port and an airport of his native land as well as his feud election, although of doubtful value to the community and for that territory, have been developed in conjunction his political career, raising doubts the selflessness and moral integrity with which the character faces his commitment to serving the state.
Now, in a normal country ruled by leaders and normally, if this ex-minister just ten months after his forced exile returns doing well on the political scene some fanfare, putting the foot shamelessly and threatening to form an autonomous group within his party, accusing him of never been the party of the people , the leader of that party should him kindly note that is not the case, that his return to politics is still inappropriate, premature and embarrassing, that certainly can not come to lecture him on what and how to do politics to serve the people.
Unfortunately, the reality is that leader that he too has its troubles, and he seems very well accustomed to expressions of modesty, and then in front of the prodigal son is disarmed, and it is not in a position to detect any inconsistencies "ethical" and the hypocrisy of preaching that comes from that pulpit. On the other hand to think of it that of "pulpits cross" with the president-owner seems to be one of the fundamental mechanisms, and the predominant determinants of that party.
0 comments:
Post a Comment